Elon Musk’s Starlink project and the truth about harmful 5G radiation

Madjid Abdellaziz
8 min readOct 3, 2021


Elon Musk, the founder and CEO of SpaceX, is launching satellites into orbit with the objective of reaching as many people as possible with high-speed broadband.

Elon Musk is most known for creating Tesla, an electric vehicle company. You may be less familiar with Musk’s Starlink company, which aims to provide internet connections to virtually everybody on the planet via an increasing network of private satellites flying overhead.

Tesla in Space

Following years of research within SpaceX and the receipt of about $885.5 million in grant from the Federal Communications Commission at the end of 2020 (source), Starlink’s growth appears to be accelerating in 2021. Following nearly three years of successful launches, the project reached 1,000 satellites in orbit in January; in June, SpaceX announced that the number had risen to over 1,800. In February, Musk’s company reported that Starlink had over 10,000 customers. After expanding preorders to even more potential customers, Musk claims that Starlink has deployed over 100,000 satellite internet terminals to users in 14 countries.

According to SpaceX, Starlink will be available globally this autumn, but regional availability will be dependent on regulatory approval. With the exception of the North and South Poles(source), Musk told an audience at Mobile World Congress in June that Starlink would be available worldwide in August. According to Musk, Starlink’s initial beta phase will end in October, showing that the service is still scaling up and expanding.

So what is Starlink?

SpaceX’s network — or “constellation” — of orbiting satellites is known as Starlink. It’s a branch of SpaceX, technically. After the network’s construction began in 2015, the first prototype satellites were sent into orbit in 2018.

source: starlink.com

In the years afterward, SpaceX has launched over 1,000 Starlink satellites into orbit, with dozens of successful missions. In January, SpaceX launched 60 satellites into orbit from Kennedy Space Center using the landable, relaunchable Falcon 9 orbital rocket for the first Starlink mission of 2021. The constellation presently contains 1,737 satellites, with the most recent launch on May 26 carrying another 60 satellites into orbit. However, some of those satellites are prototypes or nonoperational units that aren’t working pieces of the network.

The controversy

The fledgling Internet service hasn’t been without its detractors. Members of the scientific community have expressed concern about the impact of Starlink’s low-earth orbit satellites on night sky vision. (source)

It’s not all about night vision.

The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced in a recent news release (source)that the commission would soon reaffirm the radiofrequency radiation (RFR) exposure limits that were imposed in the late 1990s. These restrictions were put in place to protect humans from the short-term heating risks posed by RFR exposure, and they are based on a behavioral change in rats exposed to microwave radiation (source).

Nonetheless, a large amount of peer-reviewed research (over 500 papers. Full list here) has proven detrimental physiological or health effects from exposure to RFR at levels too low to cause considerable heating since the FCC set these restrictions in the 1980s.

The International EMF Scientist Appeal (source), which cites this large body of knowledge, was signed by more than 240 scientists who published peer-reviewed studies on nonionizing electromagnetic fields’ biologic and physiological implications (EMF).

According to several recent scientific papers, EMF impacts live species at levels well below most international and national standards. Only a few of the adverse effects include increased cancer risk, cellular stress, increased hazardous free radicals, genetic damage, structural and functional abnormalities in the reproductive system, learning and memory deficits, neurological illnesses, and negative impacts on human well-being. There is rising evidence of negative effects on both plant and animal life, implying that the damage is far-reaching.”

The scientists who signed the letter are thought to represent the vast majority of nonionizing radiation experts. They’ve written around 2,000 papers and letters on EMF in professional journals.

The FCC’s RFR exposure limits regulate exposure intensity while taking carrier wave frequency into account, but they ignore the RFR’s signaling properties. In addition to the patterns and duration of exposures, certain properties of the signal (e.g., pulsing, polarization) raise the physiological and health implications of the exposure (source). New exposure limits are needed to account for these variances.

The World Health Organization’s International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) classified RFR as “possibly carcinogenic to humans” in 2011(source). Last year, the US National Toxicology Program (NTP) disclosed the results of a $30 million study that found “clear evidence” that two years of cell phone RFR exposure caused cancer in male rats and damaged DNA in rats and mice of both sexes (sources). The Ramazzini Institute in Italy replicated the key conclusion of the NTP by using a different carrier frequency and substantially lesser exposure to cell phone radiation throughout the course of the rats’ lifetimes.

RFR has been re-examined by the IARC in the next five years, based on evidence published after 2011, including human and animal studies as well as mechanistic data. RFR’s carcinogenic potential is expected to be upgraded by the IARC in the near future, as many EMF experts believe we now have enough evidence to designate it as a probable or known human carcinogen (source).

Despite this, the FDA recently reaffirmed the FCC’s 1996 exposure limits in a letter to the FCC (source), stating that “no changes to the current standards are warranted at this time” and that “NTP’s experimental findings should not be applied to human cell phone usage,” without conducting a formal risk assessment or a systematic review of the research on RFR health effects. According to the letter, “existing scientific research to date does not show negative health impacts in persons due to exposures at or below the current limits.”

Millimeter waves will be utilized alongside microwaves in the most recent cellular technology, 5G, for the first time, in addition to microwaves used in previous cellular technologies, 2G through 4G. 5G will require cell antennas every 100 to 200 meters because of its limited range, exposing a huge number of people to millimeter-wave radiation. In 5G, new technologies (e.g., active antennas with beam-forming capabilities; phased arrays; large multiple inputs and outputs, or massive MIMO) are being deployed, posing unique challenges for exposure monitoring.

Millimeter waves are absorbed mostly in the surface layers of the cornea and within a few centimeters of human skin. The peripheral nervous system, immune system, and cardiovascular system have all been demonstrated to be negatively affected by short-term exposure. According to the findings, long-term exposure can harm the skin (e.g., melanoma), eyes (e.g., ocular melanoma), and testes (e.g., sterility).

Because 5G is such a new technology, no research on its health effects has been done, therefore we are “flying blind,” as one senator called it. However, there is a wealth of information pointing to the harmful effects of 2G and 3G. Because governments failed to support this research, little is known about the long-term impacts of 4G, a 10-year-old technology. Meanwhile, tumor registries reveal an increase in some types of head and neck cancers, which may be linked to the rise in cell phone radiation. These increases are consistent with case-control studies on the incidence of tumors in heavy cell phone users.

5G will not completely replace 4G; instead, it will cohabit with it in the near future, and possibly in the long run. If multiple types of RFR are exposed at the same time and have synergistic effects, our overall risk of injury from RFR could soar. RFR has been linked to neurological and reproductive issues, most likely as a result of oxidative stress.

All these satellites that will be launched in the lower orbit under the Starlink project will be providing high-speed internet to all the people on the planet. That will only increase the threat of radiation multiple folds.

There is a solution

Holo Fractal Harmonizer, which I created based on the work of Wilhelm Reich, Viktor Schauberger, and Nicola Tesla, has proven to be an efficient defense against electrosmog and 5G.

Madjid Abdellaziz

My work was inspired by the findings of Wilhelm Reich.

In the 1950s, Wilhelm Reich recognized electro smog, which has a deleterious impact on physiological processes and causes life energy to freeze. Multiple functional problems in the organism arose as a result of this. He used ORGON energy to treat his patients, reintroducing life energy into the natural flow.

As discovered by Wilhelm Reich — The vibrations in the atmosphere are changed by alternating electric, magnetic, and direct fields, which throw the orgone field out of equilibrium. People’s thinking shifts when the frequency of this global and subtle field shifts.

We are now exposed to toxic fields nearly everywhere as a result of increased digitalization, and the periods in which we may rejuvenate are becoming less and shorter.

5G has the ability to affect our ideas and conduct, as well as control individuals. Man becomes an “animal” when the pineal gland is diminished in size by rays.

The good news is that you can shield yourself against 5G, electrosmog, and other forms of manipulation by using a holo-fractal harmonizer.


In my practical research I have found concrete evidence of how Holo Fractal Harmonizer can help :

By shielding harmful rays, it delivers more energy.

Its healing vibrations restore harmony to the atmosphere, which has been disrupted by electromagnetic pollution and 5G.

It restores balance to the orgone field in your immediate area, purifying the vibrations.

It converts the surrounding environment to an alkaline state, removing any stress created by computers, cell phones, smart meters, electrical wires, or televisions.

The Holo fractal harmonizer, above all, produces a field in which our bodies can work effectively. It assists one in experiencing a deep sense of oneness with nature.

Visit https://integrale-umweltheilung.com/holo-fraktal-harmonisierer/ to learn more about the Holo Fractal Harmonizer and the immense benefits it gives to those desiring to shield themselves from the dangerous effects of 5G radiation and radiations from the Starlink project.



Madjid Abdellaziz

Founder of the “Desert Greening” project in 2004 . Thanks to the wonderful regeneration of nature, the local microclimate has been self-sustaining since 2016.